Sushi Wars

A new post:

Friday, 24 June 2011 Sushi Wars The interrogatory arises with more and more commonness these days: To sushi or not to sushi? There is a expanding contingent of conscientious mariners and travelers confused there who refuse to eat aggregate seafood, arguing that sea life has been likewise injudiciously hammered in the past five decades that grant that it’s going to survive we be in want of to give it a true make docile. That path, of course, puts at danger the livelihoods of 30 million-plus global fishermen and the related industry they support. Others, attempting to prefer wisely, attempt to navigate by choosing likewise-called sustainable seafood, which leads begone from the big-name predators (tuna, salmon, swordfish, mahi-mahi) towards smaller, inferior-popular thus still prolific species. But in the booming sushi chaffer, opting for that admittedly delicious tuna and other at-exposure to harm fish can prompt lively pre-dinner brawls, equitable among the most enlightened carrying pungent phones armed with apps to succor steer them towards the “safest” drag on the menu. With bluefin gratify heating up in the Mediterranean the discussion is ever more relevant. Several weeks ~ne Sea Shepherd’s “Operation Blue Rage” sent two of its boats, the Steve Irwin and Brigitte Bardot, to the sail along the ~ of Libya to help monitor and take in the order of the signs action if it observes illegal tuna-ing. Posted by john at 12:32 0 comments:

Continue here:
Sushi Wars